Transfer Pricing

Canada (Her Majesty the Queen) v. Cameco Corporation

The Federal Court of Appeal’s ruling in the case between Her Majesty The Queen and Cameco Corporation centers on the application of Canada’s transfer pricing rules, particularly under Section 247 of the Income Tax Act.

Canada (Her Majesty the Queen) v. Cameco Corporation Read More »

Mopani Copper Mines PLC v. Zambia Revenue Authority

The Supreme Court of Zambia ruled on the appeal by Mopani Copper Mines PLC against the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) regarding tax assessments for the charge years 2006/07, 2007/08, and subsequent years. The dispute centered on the transfer pricing practices between Mopani and its shareholder, Glencore International AG (GIAG).

Mopani Copper Mines PLC v. Zambia Revenue Authority Read More »

Anwar & Co. v. CIT: Understanding Permanent Establishment in International Taxation

The case of Anwar & Co. v. CIT is a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of India that delves deep into Permanent Establishment (PE) and its implications for cross-border taxation. The court was tasked with determining whether the activities of a foreign company in India, facilitated through Anwar & Co., constituted a PE, thereby attracting Indian tax liabilities.

Anwar & Co. v. CIT: Understanding Permanent Establishment in International Taxation Read More »

Zimmer Ltd. vs. Germany (2018): Implications for International Taxation and Transfer Pricing

Explore our detailed analysis of the Zimmer Ltd. vs. Germany (2018) case. Learn how this ECJ judgment impacts the definition of Permanent Establishment and international tax compliance.

Zimmer Ltd. vs. Germany (2018): Implications for International Taxation and Transfer Pricing Read More »

GlaxoSmithKline v. CIR (Philippines)

In GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Philippines, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR), the Supreme Court of the Philippines upheld a tax deficiency assessment against GSK Philippines, emphasizing the importance of adhering to transfer pricing regulations. The case was a landmark decision in 2018, underscoring the significance of the arm’s length principle in determining taxable income for multinational corporations.

GlaxoSmithKline v. CIR (Philippines) Read More »

Chevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation

The Chevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCAFC 62 case is a landmark judgment by the Federal Court of Australia concerning the application of transfer pricing rules.

Chevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation Read More »

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. ACIT

The Delhi High Court’s ruling in the Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. ACIT case is a landmark decision that addresses the complex issue of whether Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) expenses incurred by Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (MSIL) constituted an international transaction under Indian Transfer Pricing (TP) laws.

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. ACIT Read More »

GlaxoSmithKline vs Canada: Transfer Pricing Case

he GlaxoSmithKline transfer pricing case was a landmark decision in Canadian tax law. It involved GSK’s Canadian subsidiary and the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The dispute centered on the pricing of ranitidine, the active ingredient in the anti-ulcer drug Zantac.

GlaxoSmithKline vs Canada: Transfer Pricing Case Read More »

Xilinx Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

The Xilinx Inc. case revolves around whether costs related to employee stock options (ESOs) should be included in the cost-sharing agreement (CSA) between Xilinx Inc. and its subsidiary Xilinx Ireland (XI) under U.S. tax regulations.

Xilinx Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Read More »

Supreme Court Judgment Analysis: Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. v. DIT (India)

The case of Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. v. DIT (India) centered on the determination of whether Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. (MSCo), a U.S.-based company, had a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India through its subsidiary, Morgan Stanley Advantage Services Pvt. Ltd. (MSAS).

Supreme Court Judgment Analysis: Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. v. DIT (India) Read More »