Case Summaries

Bechan vs SARS: Search and Seizure Powers of Revenue Authorities

The case of Bechan and Another v SARS Customs Investigations Unit and Others was heard by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) of South Africa, where Mr. Kapeel Bechan, alongside his company, Bechan Consulting (Pty) Ltd, sought to reclaim property seized by SARS officials during a search warrant operation targeting Bullion Star (Pty) Ltd.

Bechan vs SARS: Search and Seizure Powers of Revenue Authorities Read More »

Australia vs SNF: In-Depth Summary

The case Commissioner of Taxation v. SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd concerned a dispute over the application of the arm’s length principle in the context of transfer pricing regulations under Australia’s Income TaxTax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)

Australia vs SNF: In-Depth Summary Read More »

The Thistle Trust vs C. South African Revenue Service: Understanding the Conduit Principle in Multi-Tiered Trusts

In the landmark case of The Thistle Trust v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service, the Constitutional Court of South Africa was tasked with examining the application of the conduit principle in the taxation of trusts, particularly focusing on how capital gains are treated within a multi-tiered trust structure.

The Thistle Trust vs C. South African Revenue Service: Understanding the Conduit Principle in Multi-Tiered Trusts Read More »

Orde van Vlaamse Balies vs Belgium: Legal Privilege and Cross-Border Tax Reporting Obligations

In Case C-694/20, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) examined the legality of certain reporting obligations imposed on lawyers under Council Directive 2011/16/EU (as amended by Directive 2018/822).

Orde van Vlaamse Balies vs Belgium: Legal Privilege and Cross-Border Tax Reporting Obligations Read More »

F SCS vs LUXEMBOURG: Safeguarding Lawyer-Client Confidentiality in Cross-Border Tax Inquiries

This case focuses on whether the Netherlands’ national tax law, which restricts the deduction of interest paid on intra-group loans in certain scenarios, is compatible with the freedom of establishment under Article 49 TFEU.

F SCS vs LUXEMBOURG: Safeguarding Lawyer-Client Confidentiality in Cross-Border Tax Inquiries Read More »

ENGIE vs EU: State Aid Decision in the EU’s Effort to Combat Selective Tax Advantages

This case involves the European Commission’s ruling that Luxembourg’s tax rulings for ENGIE constituted unlawful state aid, creating tax advantages that contravened the competitive balance required under EU law.

ENGIE vs EU: State Aid Decision in the EU’s Effort to Combat Selective Tax Advantages Read More »

Lexel AB v Sweden (Skatteverket): CJEU Ruling on Interest Deductions and Freedom of Establishment

In Lexel AB v Skatteverket (Case C‑484/19), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that Swedish tax legislation, which denied Lexel AB the right to deduct interest payments made to a group company located in another EU Member State (France), infringed upon the freedom of establishment protected under Article 49 TFEU.

Lexel AB v Sweden (Skatteverket): CJEU Ruling on Interest Deductions and Freedom of Establishment Read More »

Cadbury Schweppes vs UK: EU Ruling on Freedom of Establishment and Tax Avoidance

The Cadbury Schweppes case is a seminal ruling in the context of the European Union’s freedom of establishment and the limitations on Member States’ tax authorities to impose tax measures on Controlled Foreign Companies (CFCs).

Cadbury Schweppes vs UK: EU Ruling on Freedom of Establishment and Tax Avoidance Read More »