Case Summaries

France vs SAS Roger Vivier: TRANSFER PRICING CASE

The judgment revolves around a tax dispute between SAS Roger Vivier Paris, a distributor of luxury goods, and the French tax authorities. The core issue concerns transfer pricing adjustments made for the financial years 2012–2014, with the tax authorities asserting that SAS Roger Vivier Paris indirectly transferred profits to foreign-related parties in non-arm’s length conditions.

France vs SAS Roger Vivier: TRANSFER PRICING CASE Read More »

India vs SC Lowy P.I. (Lux): International Tax Case

The judgment in SC Lowy P.I. (Lux) S.A.R.L. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT) revolved around the denial of treaty benefits under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Luxembourg.

India vs SC Lowy P.I. (Lux): International Tax Case Read More »

India vs Samsung Electronics: Permanent Establishment Dispute

The High Court of Delhi ruled on appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) against Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (ITAT) earlier decisions.

India vs Samsung Electronics: Permanent Establishment Dispute Read More »

Sweden vs “CA AB”: TRANSFER PRICING CASE

The case at hand concerns a dispute under the Nordic Tax Convention, a treaty aimed at avoiding double taxation among its signatories. The applicant, [Company Name Redacted] AB, received interest income from a related Norwegian entity in 2011 and 2012, which was taxed in Sweden.

Sweden vs “CA AB”: TRANSFER PRICING CASE Read More »

Kenya vs Avic International: TRANSFER PRICING CASE

The Tax Appeals Tribunal in Kenya ruled on the case involving AVIC International Beijing (EA) Limited (Appellant) and the Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Respondent) concerning disputed tax assessments covering Corporation Tax, PAYE, and Withholding Tax (WHT) for the years 2016 to 2023.

Kenya vs Avic International: TRANSFER PRICING CASE Read More »

Denmark vs Accenture: Transfer Pricing Case

The Danish Supreme Court rendered its decision in the case of Accenture A/S v. Danish Ministry of Taxation, upholding the lower court’s judgment. The dispute revolved around the transfer pricing arrangements within the Accenture group, particularly concerning cross-border personnel assignments and intellectual property (IP) licensing agreements.

Denmark vs Accenture: Transfer Pricing Case Read More »

Poland vs Bedding Textiles: TRANSFER PRICING CASE

The case involves a dispute between N Sp. z o.o. (“the Company”), a Polish textile manufacturer, and the Director of the Tax Administration Chamber in Łódź regarding corporate income tax liabilities for the year 2020.

Poland vs Bedding Textiles: TRANSFER PRICING CASE Read More »

France vs Foncière Vélizy Rose: TRANSFER PRICING CASE

The Council of State reviewed an appeal by Foncière Vélizy Rose (FVR) regarding the withholding tax on an interim dividend of EUR 3.6 million distributed to Vélizy Rose Investment (VRI), a Luxembourg-based entity, which was subsequently paid to Dewnos Investment. The Paris Administrative Court of Appeal had dismissed FVR’s claim to discharge this withholding tax, prompting the appeal.

France vs Foncière Vélizy Rose: TRANSFER PRICING CASE Read More »

Delhi High Court vs ABIC India Pvt. Ltd: TRANSFER PRICING CASE

The High Court of Delhi, in its judgment dated 14 October 2024, upheld the Tribunal’s decision to reinstate the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the most appropriate transfer pricing method for SABIC India Pvt Ltd. The Revenue, represented by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -7, challenged the Tribunal’s ruling, which annulled the adjustment of ₹3,61,32,20,620/- made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) using the residual “other method” under Rule 10B(1)(f) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.

Delhi High Court vs ABIC India Pvt. Ltd: TRANSFER PRICING CASE Read More »

RSA vs Wiese & Others: TAX DEBT RECOVERY CASE

The Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa (SCA) ruled against Christoffel Hendrik Wiese and other appellants in their appeal concerning SARS’s efforts to recover a tax debt under section 183 of the Tax Administration Act (TAA).

RSA vs Wiese & Others: TAX DEBT RECOVERY CASE Read More »