Tax Dispute Resolution

Australia vs Oracle: Transfer Pricing Case

This case addressed Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Ltd’s application to temporarily stay domestic court proceedings while a Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) under the Australia-Ireland double taxation treaty was ongoing. The case revolved around whether payments made by Oracle Australia to Oracle Ireland for sublicensing software were “royalties” under the treaty and thus subject to Australian withholding tax obligations.

Australia vs Oracle: Transfer Pricing Case Read More »

UK vs Glencore Energy: Transfer Pricing Case

This case examines the boundaries of judicial review in tax disputes involving the Diverted Profits Tax (DPT), a tax introduced by the Finance Act 2015 to prevent profit shifting by multinationals. Glencore Energy UK Limited (GENUK), a subsidiary of the Swiss-based Glencore International AG (GIAG), was assessed under the DPT framework after HMRC deemed the service fees paid by GENUK to GIAG under a Risk and Services Agreement (RSA) to be excessive.

UK vs Glencore Energy: Transfer Pricing Case Read More »

Canada vs General Electric Capital Canada: Transfer Pricing Case

The case of Canada v. General Electric Capital Canada Inc. (2010 FCA 344) revolved around whether guarantee fees paid by GE Canada to its parent company, GECUS, adhered to the arm’s length principle under Canadian tax law. GE Canada claimed deductions for these fees in its income calculations for the 1996–2000 taxation years.

Canada vs General Electric Capital Canada: Transfer Pricing Case Read More »

UK vs REFINITIV AND OTHERS (Thomson Reuters): Transfer Pricing Case

The Court of Appeal’s decision in Refinitiv v HMRC is a defining moment in the intersection of transfer pricing and Diverted Profits Tax (DPT). The case revolved around DPT notices issued to three UK-resident companies within the Thomson Reuters group for the 2018 tax period, totaling over £167 million.

UK vs REFINITIV AND OTHERS (Thomson Reuters): Transfer Pricing Case Read More »

Slovakia vs Minebea Access Solutions: Transfer Pricing Case

The Minebea Slovakia transfer pricing case highlights the intricate challenges of aligning intra-group transactions with arm’s length principles. In this landmark ruling, the Supreme Administrative Court of Slovakia dismissed a cassation complaint filed by Minebea Access Solutions Slovakia s.r.o., a subsidiary of the Valeo Group.

Slovakia vs Minebea Access Solutions: Transfer Pricing Case Read More »

Italy v. Ilapak SPA Transfer Pricing Case

The Italy v. Ilapark SPA case brings forward critical issues in transfer pricing, specifically the appropriateness of the selected transfer pricing method for a business entity under Italy’s tax framework and its alignment with OECD guidelines.

Italy v. Ilapak SPA Transfer Pricing Case Read More »

Insights from Boerdery v SARS: Assessing Deductibility of Premiums in Farming

In Boerdery v SARS, the South African Tax Court addressed whether premiums paid by Boerdery under insurance contracts with Company XYZ were deductible under section 11(a) of the Income Tax Act. Boerdery claimed the premiums as deductible expenses, arguing they represented insurance costs necessary for its farming business.

Insights from Boerdery v SARS: Assessing Deductibility of Premiums in Farming Read More »

Australia vs SNF: In-Depth Summary

The case Commissioner of Taxation v. SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd concerned a dispute over the application of the arm’s length principle in the context of transfer pricing regulations under Australia’s Income TaxTax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)

Australia vs SNF: In-Depth Summary Read More »

Australia vs SingTel Transfer Pricing Case

The High Court of Australia deliberated on a significant transfer pricing case between Singapore Telecom Australia Investments Pty Ltd (STAI) and the Commissioner of Taxation, centering on whether a parental guarantee should be implied in assessing the arm’s length nature of intercompany loans.

Australia vs SingTel Transfer Pricing Case Read More »

The Thistle Trust vs C. South African Revenue Service: Understanding the Conduit Principle in Multi-Tiered Trusts

In the landmark case of The Thistle Trust v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service, the Constitutional Court of South Africa was tasked with examining the application of the conduit principle in the taxation of trusts, particularly focusing on how capital gains are treated within a multi-tiered trust structure.

The Thistle Trust vs C. South African Revenue Service: Understanding the Conduit Principle in Multi-Tiered Trusts Read More »