Dispute Resolution

Dart Sudamericana Transfer Pricing Case

The case revolves around the transfer pricing methods used by Dart Sudamericana S.A. for the importation of EPS pellets from related companies. The primary contention was whether the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method or the Net Transaction Margin Method (NTMM) was appropriate for determining the arm’s length price of these transactions.

Dart Sudamericana Transfer Pricing Case Read More »

3M Company v Commissioner of Internal Revenue: U.S. Transfer Pricing and Foreign Legal Restrictions

The dispute focused on the income tax treatment of intellectual property (IP) transactions between 3M’s U.S. subsidiaries and its Brazilian subsidiary, 3M do Brasil Ltda (3M Brazil), for the tax year 2006.

3M Company v Commissioner of Internal Revenue: U.S. Transfer Pricing and Foreign Legal Restrictions Read More »

Nokia vs. India: Permanent Establishment and Profit Attribution Dispute

The case revolved around whether Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy had a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, and whether profits could be attributed to that PE under the India-Finland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).

Nokia vs. India: Permanent Establishment and Profit Attribution Dispute Read More »

Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe and Ireland v Luxembourg: State Aid, Transfer Pricing, and the Arm’s Length Principle

The case involves two appeals by Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe (formerly Fiat Finance and Trade Ltd) and Ireland, challenging the General Court’s decision to uphold a European Commission ruling that a tax ruling granted by Luxembourg to Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe constituted unlawful state aid.

Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe and Ireland v Luxembourg: State Aid, Transfer Pricing, and the Arm’s Length Principle Read More »

Eaton Corporation vs. IRS: Transfer Pricing Dispute

Eaton Corporation, a global manufacturer of electrical and industrial products, faced significant tax disputes with the IRS regarding its transfer pricing practices. The disputes centered around the company’s Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) with the IRS, which were intended to establish transfer pricing methodologies for transactions between Eaton and its subsidiaries. The APAs were canceled by the IRS, leading to a tax court case in 2017 and an appeal in 2022.

Eaton Corporation vs. IRS: Transfer Pricing Dispute Read More »

Medtronic vs Commissioner of Inland Revenue

The case of Medtronic, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue revolves around the complex issue of transfer pricing, particularly concerning the appropriate method to determine the arm’s length royalty rates for the use of intellectual property between Medtronic US and its Puerto Rican subsidiary, MPROC.

Medtronic vs Commissioner of Inland Revenue Read More »

Ferragamo France Transfer Pricing Case: Key Lessons for Luxury Brands

The Ferragamo France transfer pricing case offers valuable insights for luxury goods companies. This landmark ruling highlights the complexities of transfer pricing in the high-end retail sector.

Ferragamo France Transfer Pricing Case: Key Lessons for Luxury Brands Read More »

UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd. Case: Transfer Pricing and Permanent EstablishmentUPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd. Case:

The case of UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd. vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax revolves around the interpretation of whether the applicant had a “Business Connection” in India and a “Permanent Establishment” (P.E.) under the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favour of UPS Asia Group, stating that when the Indian Associated Enterprise (A.E.) is remunerated at arm’s length price, no further profit attribution is required, making the existence of a P.E. tax-neutral.

UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd. Case: Transfer Pricing and Permanent EstablishmentUPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd. Case: Read More »